The judges of Winnebago County are as follows:
• Chief Judge Scott Woldt (circuit court)
• Judge Barbara Key (circuit court)
• Judge Scott Byrd (court of appeals)
• Judge Bruce Schroeder (circuit court)
• Judge Michael Fitzpatrick (circuit court)
• Judge Christopher Horne (court of appeals)
• Judge Barbara Key (court of appeals)
• Judge Thomas Gritton (circuit court)
• Judge Kenneth Sandvik (circuit court)
• Judge Lawrence J. Betts (court of appeals)
• Judge Brian Pfitzinger (circuit court)
• Judge Joseph Voiland (court of appeals)
• Judge Kendall Kelley (court of appeals)
• Judge David Kracke (circuit court)
• Judge Tim Kay (court of appeals)
• Judge William Foster (circuit court).
The county also has several associate judges, who are appointed by the chief judge. These associate judges include Brian Ross, Brett Lhotka, Kurt Grimm, Jeffrey Kremers, and Jennifer Berzowski.
How are most Illinois state judges chosen?
Most Illinois state judges are chosen through a two-phase election process. In the first phase, candidate judges participate in a primary election that is open to all registered voters in the district.
During this primary, candidates may self-identify as either a Democrat or Republican, although some judicial seats are also designated as nonpartisan positions. The number of primary election voters who cast ballots for each candidate is then tallied, and the two candidates who receive the most votes—regardless of party—advance to the general election.
During the general election, all registered voters in the district can again cast ballots for their preferred candidate, and the candidate who receives the most votes ultimately wins the seat. This process ensures that judicial candidates are chosen based on their qualifications—not their political affiliation.
How do I contact my local judge?
If you need to contact your local judge, the best course of action is to call the courthouse or local court and ask the operator to help you locate the judge’s contact information. You can also visit the court website to locate the name of the judge and contact information, such as a phone number or email address.
Additionally, you can also search for the judicial district or court using a search engine, which may provide contact information as well as bios or biographies for each judge. When contacting the judge, be sure to be respectful, concise and professional.
Include information such as why you are calling, your name and contact information, as well as any other relevant information. If you are unable to locate contact information, you may be asked to write a letter to the judge and include pertinent information in the letter.
Is Saurabh Kirpal a judge?
No, Saurabh Kirpal is not a judge. He is an experienced lawyer, a dispute resolution specialist, and a corporate trainer. He is a Senior Partner at Spice Route Legal, New Delhi, India, and advises domestic and international clients on various matters related to dispute resolution, including arbitration, negotiations, litigation, and ADR.
He is a Member of the Prevention of Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Committee of the Supreme Court of India, and also on the panel of arbitrators at the Delhi International Arbitration Centre. His profile also includes being a Council Member of the Institute of Company Secretaries of India and being a Faculty & Senior Chair at National Law University, New Delhi.
Who is judge Jerome Mnguni?
Judge Jerome Mnguni is a South African Constitutional Court judge and is a highly distinguished public figure. He was born and raised in Soweto, Johannesburg and studied law at the University of the North.
Judge Mnguni has played an integral role in the South African democratic transition.
Judge Mnguni presided over numerous high-profile judgements including the declarations of invalidity of the Trespass Act and the common-law rule allowing for limitation of damages for medical negligence.
Judge Mnguni has also held various positions in the African National Congress (ANC).
Currently, he curates the ANC’s National Constitutional Judges Forum. This forum provides a platform for South African judges to engage in topical constitutional issues and constitutional jurisprudence.
Judge Mnguni is highly esteemed in South Africa as well as in the legal fraternity as a whole. He is respected as an advocate for justice and human rights. He remains an inspiration and exemplar in protecting and upholding the rule of law in South Africa.
Who is the current chief judge of Rivers State?
The current chief judge of Rivers State is Hon. Justice Iyayi Laminkara. He was sworn into office on the 18th of June 2020, after he was appointed by His Excellency, Governor Nyesom Wike. Prior to his appointment, Justice Iyayi Laminkara had been a Justice of the High Court of Rivers State since 2016.
He has served in several capacities in the judiciary, including Acting Chief Judge of Rivers State on two occasions. He holds a Doctorate in Law, a Master’s of Law and the Bachelor’s of Law, which gives him more than 15 years of legal experience.
Justice Iyayi Laminkara is committed to strengthening the judicial system in Rivers State and will uphold the values of independence, fairness, integrity, and justice.
Who is judge Randy Moss?
Judge Randy Moss is a United States District Judge for the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia. Judge Moss was born on May 21, 1956 in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. He was raised in West Virginia and received his undergraduate degree from Marshall University and his juris doctor degree from West Virginia University College of Law in 1982.
Judge Moss also served in the West Virginia Army National Guard from 1982 to 1988 and as an Army Reserve Judge Advocate from 1988 to 1992.
Judge Moss was nominated by President George W. Bush and confirmed by the Senate on October 2, 2003. Since then, Judge Moss has served with distinction on the United States District Court. Judge Moss has presided over hundreds of civil and criminal cases and is widely respected for his fairness, diligence and extensive knowledge of the law.
Judge Moss also serves as an adjunct professor of law at West Virginia University College of Law, where he teaches a course in alternative dispute resolution.
Who is the judge in Crawford County Arkansas?
The judge of Crawford County Arkansas is the Honorable Gary Cottrell, a longtime resident of the county and the city. He was first elected to the position of judge in November 2000, and he has since been re-elected in 2004, 2008, 2012, and 2016.
He serves a four-year term and is the presiding judge of the Crawford County Quorum Court. He is a graduate of the University of Arkansas, where he studied law and government, and also holds a master’s degree in public policy.
As judge, his duties include presiding over the Quorum Court and acting as the county executive in matters related to county budgeting, recordkeeping, and law enforcement. He presides over all matters before the court, including criminal, civil, and juvenile cases.
Additionally, he administers and enforces the rules and regulations of the county, which are set forth by the Arkansas Constitution, Arkansas Statutes, and the local county code.
What do county judges do in Arkansas?
In Arkansas, county judges perform a variety of important duties. As chief executive officers of county government, they ensure that county offices run efficiently. Additionally, they serve as the presiding officer of the county’s Quorum Court.
They must certify the county’s annual budget and approve or reject legislation sent to them by the Quorum Court.
County judges have administrative responsibilities that vary widely. They maintain public records, oversee county departments and employees, coordinate elections, and certify the results of elections.
They have the authority to appoint directors and legal advisors to county positions. They must review the county’s books and accounts, issue bonds and licenses, and provide security for public buildings when necessary.
County judges serve as the main officers of justice in Arkansas. They hear cases pertaining to civil and criminal law, probate matters, and juvenile matters. They maintain a court record for each case and decide disputes between two or more parties.
They also set bond amounts for accused criminals and must follow all state and federal laws when making rulings.
In addition to their duties in the court, county judges often serve in an advisory role to the Quorum Court, providing suggestions and direction regarding county matters. They also work with local government members and agencies, such as the police, sheriffs, attorneys, and community organizations, to ensure that county projects are successful.
Who was Crawford County Arkansas named after?
Crawford County in Arkansas was named after William H. Crawford, the United States Secretary of War and Treasury under the administration of President James Madison. He was born in what is now known as Amherst County, Virginia, and joined the military service at a young age.
He was eventually sent to North Carolina where he served as an officer under General Charles Lee. His military career brought him to the attention of President Madison and he was appointed as Secretary of War and Treasury in 1815.
After his successful tenure in the Cabinet, Crawford decided to challenge for the 1824 presidential nomination. Though he suffered a stroke during his campaign and was not able to address the Democratic-Republican Party’s nominating convention, Crawford still won the nomination.
He would eventually lose to Andrew Jackson in the general election.
In recognition of his service to the state of Arkansas, Crawford County was named after Crawford. The County was formed by the Arkansas State Legislature on October 18, 1820, making it one of the earliest Arkansas counties in the state.
Although Crawford never actually visited Arkansas, his name remains forever connected to the state through his namesake county.
What are the 3 types of judges?
There are three main types of judges: trial judges, appellate judges, and Supreme Court justices.
Trial judges preside over trials and hear evidence from both sides before making a decision. They are the first judges to hear cases and provide rulings on matters of law.
Appellate judges hear appeals from the decisions of trial judges. Usually, two or more appellate judges will review the documents and oral arguments of the parties and then decide on the outcome of the case.
Lastly, Supreme Court justices are the highest-ranking judges in the judicial system and the only ones who hear cases at the federal level. The Supreme Court has the power to try cases that involve constitutional issues, overturn laws, and interpret federal statutes.
They are appointed by the President and approved by the Senate.
What are the three responsibilities of the judges?
The three primary responsibilities of judges include impartially interpreting laws, fairly resolving disputes, and protecting rights and liberties as outlined by the U.S. Constitution.
In terms of impartially interpreting laws, judges must consider all facts of a case and adhere to current legal precedent when ruling on a decision. This means they must be knowledgeable in all areas of law, including civil and criminal law, as well as any applicable local or state ordinances.
Judges must also remain neutral, impartial, and independent, especially when ruling on cases of political or social importance.
In terms of fairly resolving disputes, judges must ensure that all parties in a dispute or lawsuit are given a fair and impartial hearing. This includes listening to all parties, considering all the evidence presented, and making a ruling based on the law and available evidence.
Judges must ensure that the outcome of a case is just, fair, and in accordance with existing laws.
Finally, judges are tasked with protecting rights and liberties as outlined by the U. S. Constitution. This includes safeguarding the rights of individuals and entities in civil disputes as well as ensuring that the laws created by Congress and state legislatures are consistent with constitutional principles.
Judges must remain impartial in these decisions, and must also recognize any bias or prejudice that could affect their decision-making process.
How much do Arkansas Supreme Court justices make?
Arkansas Supreme Court justices make an annual salary of $158,059. This salary is based on the state Law Allotment legislation set in the 2018 Regular Session of the Arkansas General Assembly. For additional salary benefits, justices are also eligible for certain travel and other work-related expenses.
This salary is subject to adjustment in accordance with the Cost of Living Adjustment laws set by the state annually.
What is the highest salary of a judge?
The highest salary of a judge in the United States depends on the particular type of judge and their jurisdiction. Generally speaking, the highest-paid judges are typically those at the federal level, with some earning as much as $256,000 per year.
Certain Supreme Court judges have a yearly salary of $267,000, and Chief Justices of the United States earn an impressive $279,100 per year.
State level judges, such as trial court judges, vary substantially in salary, depending on their state and jurisdiction. Similarly, court of appeals judges earn annual salaries ranging from around $125,000 to the upper $200,000’s in some states.
It’s important to keep in mind that salaries of judges on the same level of government can vary significantly. For example, the highest salary for a state Supreme Court justice in California was $261,949 in 2019, while in Wisconsin, a state Supreme Court justice earned a salary of $145,016 that same year.
Additionally, local judges typically make substantially less than state and federal judges. Their salaries range anywhere from $48,000 to $160,000, depending on the locality.
Overall, the highest salary of a judge in the United States is $279,100 for a Chief Justice of the United States, with federal judges generally receiving the highest salaries. State Supreme Court justices can also make upwards of $200,000 or more depending on the jurisdiction, while local court judges are typically paid significantly less.
What is the difference between a circuit judge and a district judge?
The main difference between a circuit judge and a district judge is the geographical jurisdiction and type of cases they hear. Circuit judges preside over cases in their circuit court and often are assigned to hear certain types of legal cases, such as those involving criminal law or civil litigation.
The geographical jurisdiction of the circuit court lies within one of the U. S. judicial circuits. On the other hand, a district judge presides over cases in their district court and are assigned to hear certain types of civil and criminal cases.
The geographical jurisdiction of the district court lies within one of the U. S. judicial districts. Both district and circuit judges serve life terms, or in some cases, a term of up to sixteen years or longer.
In addition to the geographical jurisdiction, district judges also have the power to issue certain orders, including statutory injunctions and writs, while circuit judges lack this power. Circuit judges also have the power to hear appeals from district courts, as well as appeals from certain administrative agency decisions.
District judges, on the other hand, do not have the power to hear appeals.